The people will live under tyranny as long as the supreme court is relied on to check the federal government.

Strict constitutionalists finally reach the end of their pilgrimage.  Note the obvious spraying in the sky.  These poor people can't see anything even when it is right in front of them.

Strict constitutionalists finally reach the end of their pilgrimage to the Supreme Court. Note the obvious spraying in the sky. These people can’t see what is right in front of them.

EarWhen Obamacare was first passed all the conservatives kept saying it was “clearly unconstitutional” and that the “courts would strike it down”. But that didn’t happen. It was upheld by a “split decision”, and now, we have it and it isn’t going anywhere. Yay, the system of freedom worked.

Okay kids who wants some more FREEDOM!

Okay Johnny tell us the answer.  “Is it because we’re free?”, not entirely.  “Well is it because we’re so much more freer and betterer than everyone else?”  almost there, “Well is it because ours is the free-est greatest country EVER like my dad says?” Now you got it, in fact, that’s the ONLY answer you ever need.  You get an “A”.

People act like the issue of whether something is “unconstitutional or not” is something that “egg heads” discuss on Sunday talk shows. People think like this because that is how the government WANTS you to think about the issue. They made you think like that in their government indoctrination centers and through the mass media. They don’t want people thinking AT ALL.

And certainly, one of the last things they can have you realize is that if the feds pass a law which takes your property, life or time “unconstitutionally” in either a tax or some other way, like Obamacare does, that there is NO DIFFERENCE between that and simply stealing. They have no authority AT ALL to do it. NONE. Do you get that? It is as “lawless” and “illegitimate” as the supposed regimes we spend billions of dollars bombing because they “aren’t legitimate”. Do you see that?

When I asked the nice man from the government where he got the authority he politely pointed to his document.

When I asked the nice man from the government where he got the authority he politely showed me his document.  When I told him it was blank, he said he knew, they all were.

The government can only act in a lawful and legitimate way by acting within the powers granted it through the Constitution. If it does something that is “unconstitutional”, that is the same as saying that it is acting lawlessly, and illegitimately.

In order to be sure that it can always grow and do whatever it wants without any consequence, the government has made up a get out of jail free card for its agents. It is called acting “under the color of law”. Meaning, government agents are basically, for all practical purposes, immune from any consequence if there was a “law” they acted under when they “acted”. It makes no difference that the law was outside any authority the government actually has. They have created this protection to encourage the agents, i.e. the police, and bureaucrats, to “enforce” any and all laws, regardless of their legitimacy. I mean, why not?  If you don’t enforce it you get fired. If you do enforce it and the law was illegitimate, you’re off the hook. You see, now that’s what I call a WIN WIN.

Do you see, that if the “exceptions” didn’t exist, then the individuals necessary for the government to act and to thereby abuse you with illegitimate laws, would hesitate to enforce those questionable laws, because they would KNOW that they could be sued individually, or be held CRIMINALLY liable for violating your constitutional rights? Do you get that? That is a key piece of the puzzle for how the game is worked on you.

They told me I was welcome to take it to the courts later.  So that's pretty great huh.

They told me I was welcome to take it to the courts later. So that’s pretty great huh.

Once you see it, you can’t unsee it. It is absurd to allow such immunity. It ENCOURAGES abuse. That is WHY the exception exists.

Without the exception, the questionable laws couldn’t be enforced, and it would FORCE EVERYONE TO THINK about the consequences and authority for their own actions. Each person would have to look at the law and the constitution and decide FOR THEMSELVES whether it met the limitations of the constitution. That can not be allowed. There must be mindless compliance with orders from the government.

The next key piece of the “unconstitutional” puzzle is the most amazing of all to me. They have actually made the people believe that “we the people”, after fighting a long bloody war to win our freedom from a central government, then decided to form a “more perfect union” with a strictly limited federal government. Now there had to be a method to keep the reigns on this Limited government. The government now tells everyone that the plan we came up with was to have a single employee of that limited government tell the whole country whether his employer was acting within its authority. Oh, and this employee bureaucrat would not be elected, and they would serve for life.

We need a it's "constitutional ruling on aisle 6".  One "it's constitutional" coming right up.

Attention, We need a clean up on aisle 6.  I’ll handle it. One “it’s constitutional” ruling coming right up.

Is that in any way credible? No, it is laughable. But that is exactly what you NOW believe. Because you believe that the U.S. Supreme court is the final arbiter of whether the U.S. Government is acting within its bounds. Do you see that? Do you believe anyone would agree to that method? No. It is absurd.

What do I mean only one, there are 9 justices on the Supreme court. Well, that’s true. But there is nothing even IN the constitution about how a decision has to be made. So the court itself has “determined” that only a majority are necessary for a binding decision. Does that itself make any sense? Of course not, it is absurd. ANY DECISION BY THE SUPREME COURT SHOULD HAVE TO BE UNANIMOUS, AT A MINIMUM!. But, alas, one’s enough.  As Maxwell Smart used to say, “missed it by that much”.

So the reality is that many many “controversial” decisions are made as 5 to 4. That means 1 justice made the decision. Get it? All we hear about now is “which way will justice Kennedy go”? Who’s the “swing vote” etc. Do you see? ONE man or woman tells the entire country what the “law is” for all time, and what their employer is “allowed to do”. One employee of the entity that employs them makes the decision for the whole country.

This is what brilliance looks like.

This is what actual brilliance looks like.

This is the supposed “genius” we are inundated with at all time about the founders brilliance in devising this great system. It would be laughable if it wasn’t actually believed by the brainwashed masses.

Now I want to look at the implication of this situation so that you can see it for what it really is. So you can once and for all stop ever saying the founders were geniuses and that the compromises they reached were brilliant and how we need to spread this system of freedom all over the world. Please once and for all that ridiculous talk needs to end.

Let’s assume they pass a law that says that the people in Missouri are now considered “terrorists”. The law further says that in order to save money in rounding these people up, that individuals are allowed to go and round up the citizens of Missouri. And in order to incentivize the activity, you get to keep 50% of any of the assets the people you catch.

Okay, now I get that the example is extreme. But I am just trying to make a point so just follow along.

Obviously when the law is passed it will be “challenged” as “unconstitutional” and everyone will assume it will get struck down as being a “violation of the equal protection” clause. But in the meantime it GOES FORWARD, get it? Now what if the Supreme court in a split decision upholds it. What is your option if you’re in Missouri?

Sound advice from a more politically savvy "Dr. Seuss".

Sound addition to Dr. Seuss’ sage wisdom.  And a nice subtle metaphor for what our government does to us all.  Thank you sir may I have another.

Nothing, it’s over. Get it? Is the law clearly a violation of equal protection? Yes. You can just read the language yourself to see that. But the “law” doesn’t protect you. There is nothing unrealistic about the example except that it is extreme in order to point out the fact that the SYSTEM does not protect the people or limit the government in any way. The SYSTEM does not do what you have been told.

And before you say, that can’t happen, look at the Credit River Case. It is undisputed that the Federal reserve notes we all use are not backed by silver or gold. The constitution’s language is clear and unequivocal. Yet, the courts have found exceptions and made stuff up to allow unconstitutional conduct and laws to be stamped as constitutional.

The same goes for the first and second amendments. The first says Congress shall make no law abridging. NO LAW ABRIDGING, Yet there is a whole body of exceptions which then proceed to abridge. They are made up, they have no validity at all, except that the people have been made to believe that one unelected guy can make up any exception he wants.

The second amendment simply cannot have more clear language. “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Again, how can there be stronger language than that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. INFRINGED FOR Pete’s sake. What stronger wording could have been used? Yet, it is all for naught.

Shown here are some early notebooks of the "Brilliant Jurist" the Honorable Justice Ginsberg.

Shown here is a page from the official court  notebook for the “Brilliant Jurist” the Honorable Justice Breyer.  The notebooks are kept by all the justices and they are a magical look into the inner workings of  the court.

Exception after exception carved out by the government employees expanding out their employers authority despite the clear unambiguous language. And the whole time the same government tells the people and they believe, that the system LIMITS the government and is “genius”.

The final piece of this laughable and shameful puzzle is the idea that once the Court rules, the only way that the people can reverse it is to get new people on the court and have them over turn it. So the people are held hostage to waiting for people to die and then hoping that they can have the right president at that time to make the right appointment to then get the case back in front of the court to get the court to then reverse.

Several constitutional scholars shown here, awaiting the Supreme court's ruling.

Several constitutional scholars shown here, awaiting the Supreme court’s ruling to find out what the law IS.

This is the genius of the framers. All hail their brilliant system of freedom. The greatest the world has ever known!!! How can anyone believe this nonsense? Honestly, it is embarrassing to me that anyone believes this.  And all it takes to see it is TO QUESTION THE BASIC THINGS YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD.  Nothing more.

Without the ability of the STATES themselves to check the federal government’s conduct and to make their OWN decisions about whether the law oversteps the constitution, there is NO CHECK get it? Without the ability of the States to secede when the Federal government oversteps, after the state determines the law is unconstitutional, there is no right to self determination. Do you see? I will leave for another time the discussion of those issues.

If you want to hear a bit more, I have it here.

Listen now.

Listen now.

Update 11-12-14

I just saw this and had to put it in here.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/12/technology/call-for-open-internet-sets-up-fight-over-rules.html?_r=0

It is about how the government is going to “help us” by making the internet even more betterer and even freerer by regulating it! yay.  Oh, and the government is arguing with itself about what the “appropriate” levels are. Boy they are really fighting it out up there.  So much controversy.  So many sides. Oh wait, only one side.  Government arguing with government.  But never fear it will all get decided ultimately by the Supreme court!  Yay, we’re saved by the brilliance of our founding father’s system once again.

It will never end until people stop accepting it.  Just normal people.

Be well my brainwashed brethren.

Legalman IS the law

Legalman IS the law

5 thoughts on “The people will live under tyranny as long as the supreme court is relied on to check the federal government.

  1. Kram

    Rule 1. waking up to the whole charade is the essential…. Rule 2. fixing anything this ingrained will only take the completion of Rule 1. Concentrate on Rule 1.

    Reply
    1. Profile photo of LegalmanLegalman Post author

      Correct Kram. Waking up to the charade is the first and most important thing. Ultimately, it is the only thing that really matters. Because “doing something about it”, is really just a pipe dream. The only thing you can actually “do” about it, is to learn to work around it. No different than living in a neighborhood run by a gang. Unless you’re Charles Bronson you’re not going to clean the place up, you need to learn to thrive under the realities that exist. But even that can’t begin to happen until you learn what the actual situation is you’re dealing with.

      Accepting the depth of the con is certainly the most difficult part for most people. If that one hurdle can be overcome, then the rest can be filled in. If it can’t, then no amount of information or persuasion will have any affect. Each person has the key to their own chains. If a person prefers clinging to the fables and myths they have been taught about this country and world, then that is their choice. They choose to live in that dream. And that is their right. The key is to get to the point where the truth alone is sufficient reward. Because the circumstances of the world are not likely to change. And unless you believe that whoever or whatever created this whole world/universe somehow made a mistake here, then the inescapable conclusion is that there is NOTHING WRONG. Intellectually I know that. Of course living in a body and dealing with the world and the emotions and the desires each day is no simple matter. But that doesn’t mean that the logic is flawed. It just means that I have a long way to go in my own personal development. We all do. And THAT much I know is true. But at least I am on the road. take care my fellow inmate. — L

      Reply
      1. Kram

        Thanks L. I already put a target on my own back. So settling the accounting with the PTB’s may be a bit painful lol. I have never been to a Proctologist but i can relate to getting royally screwed… I do have control over my attitude and all internal operations functional. I am in excellent health and on the path toward peace. Thanks for your comments. Peace

        Reply
  2. jay

    There are four things that need to happen to fix the problems of “modern” US Government.

    1) Eliminate all “individual” taxes, you may impose sales or ad valorem taxes on consumption of goods and maybe services, but not so many different taxes on passive and earned income! The current tax code is so progressive, there is an incentive to EARN LESS so you don’t have to spend days figuring out all the Federal hieroglyphics of the tax code we now have and never should have been saddled with in 1913!

    2) Get rid of the Federal Reserve which is a private company which controls OUR currency by a group of European Bankers! How on earth did Woodrow Wilson sign such a piece of criminal legislation into law? The same way he signed the Tax Act of 1913 I suppose, corruption and treason! We need a currency based on a precious metal, gold, platinum, silver? anything but FIAT currency which is NOT a store of value at all!

    3) Term limits, election and campaign reform. No election can last longer than one month, and no election can cost more than $500K, and ONE TERM for all offices including the Senate which goes back to 4 year terms! Included in this is a provision that all elected officials must create a balanced budget of be sent to prison! No more back-room deals with MY money, thank-you!

    4) The Supreme Court becomes an elected office, and also is limited to one -four year term, and if they violate the Constitution are subject to be imprisoned for such actions-treason! Oh and the Patriot Act, and the ACA are rescinded with a competitive system where Doctor’s rates are set by their COMPETENCE and not the fact they made it through Med school somewhere, they have to CURE people, not just treat diseases now! Health Insurers do NOT have the right to determine what care you chose to take!

    I have about a hundred more changes that just create more freedom for us and keep a strong military to defend us and our BORDERS! these are just the first that came to mind when asked to comment! Have a nice day, hope it includes lots of freedom!

    Reply
    1. Crocodile

      We DON’T “need a currency based on a precious metal, gold, platinum, silver”.

      Metals were ALWAYS bankster’s money.
      Learn first !

      You can start by watching a documentary on Youtube :
      The Money Masters 1996 FULL DOCUMENTARY

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *