Tag Archives: consitution

They forced legal tender laws on us by packing the court.

A rare glimpse behind the scenes showing how they REALLY fixed the FDR court "packing" scheme.

Most people don’t know it, but I have been personally involved in “unpacking” the supreme court.

I get quite a kick out of observing how effective the brainwashing system is they use on us. As with all good brainwashing systems, the victims do not understand that they even are victims.  Most people believe that the holy Supreme Court has 9 justices on it because the holy constitution sets that number. As usual, most people are wrong. Lol The constitution says NOTHING about it.

That’s right. The number is set by Congress, which of course can OVERRIDE the president’s “veto”. Showing once again that the 3 branches are NOT equal and NEVER were designed to be EQUAL. That “co-equal” crap is just another fundamental lie you are taught in the indoctrination centers. How can Congress be equal yet “in charge” of something as fundamental as the number of justices or have the power to override the President? It is absurd.

Now that I have it figured out the scam I have a lot more time to spend on things I love, like Yoga.

Now that I have it figured out the scam I have a lot more time to spend on things I love, like Yoga.

Congress is above the court and the president. Congress can REMOVE the president. Congress can remove Justices and set the number of justices. It is not EQUAL. You have been told the “equal branches” lie again and again so that you don’t question things like the ABSURD CONCEPT that ONE unelected supreme court justice can set aside laws and MAKE laws. A simple 5 to 4 court decision and poof we are all “bound” to obey. Do you see how convenient that is for those in charge?

For the most part, the only thing anyone comes out of government schooling knowing about the Supreme court is that it “has 9 justices” and that FDR created a potential “constitutional crises” when he suggested “packing the court” with “additional justices” to get his new deal legislation passed. Why is this all that is left in most peoples minds after they attend the government schools? Well when you know the truth it makes perfect sense. So let me tell you.

It traces back to that time called “reconstruction”. War and its aftermath are continuously used by those in power to destroy evidence of their deeds and to muddy the waters and to reset the “history” that is taught. The “civil war” is a classic example. If you still believe it was fought to free the slaves I encourage you to do some research, lol. You can start here.

They said I was a shoe in for the next vacancy on the court, but when I got there it had already been filled.

They said I was a shoe in to get the next seat on the court, but you can see that when I got there the seat was taken.

If you still think Lincoln cared a wit about “freeing the slaves” consider this. The emancipation proclamation did not free a single slave in any territory that the UNION CONTROLLED.  And consider this PUBLICLY issued statement from “the great emancipator”.

My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union..

Get it? The civil war had NOTHING TO DO with freeing the slaves. NOTHING. That was an issue the power elite manipulated, nothing more. The real issue that was “RESOLVED” by force in the “civil war” was the right to leave a “voluntary” union.  That war and the “reconstruction era” after it provided an opportunity for the power grabbing central government to fundamentally change “the union”.

Here is my Uncle Joe.  I don't have a lot of book learning but even I was learned in skool that they fought the civil war to free the blacks.

I may not have a lot of book learning but even I was learned in skool that they fought the civil war to free the blacks.

Since that war they have worked very hard to make it appear that anyone who tries to discuss the legal points of SECESSION is a racist “hick” who  “supports slavery”. And thus they silence the discussion. It is a simple trick of rhetoric. Nothing more. But people fall for it of course because they are fundamentally mis-educated and brainwashed.

During much of the early 19th century the number of justices in the supreme court was tied to the number of appellate circuits. That meant the number moved around and eventually there were as many as 10 justices on the court by the mid 1860’s. But then congress passed a law that would reduce the number down as some retired. It was during this time as they were retiring and the number was dropping that a very important case was decided. It was called Hepburn v. Griswold, 75 U.S. 603 (1870).

I tried to get him to pay me with chicks, but he knew the law and so I had to take his Federal Reserve Notes.

I tried to convince this wall street guy to pay me with some inside information, but he knew about the legal tender laws so I had to take his sh***y Federal Reserve Notes.

That case struck down the “LEGAL TENDER” law that congress had passed during the war. STRUCK DOWN.  Legal tender laws are how the loving government forces you to accept a fiat currency that is backed by NOTHING as opposed to being BACKED by gold or silver.  In other words a law where the government REQUIRES you exchange things of value you have for something they CREATE OUT OF THIN AIR that has NO VALUE.  Legal tender laws clearly violate the 5th amendment by allowing the government to take your property without giving you fair value for it.  Get it?

Fiat currency is the HEART of the control system for the entire economy and country. Without legal tender laws it WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE to run the current scam.

So when the court strikes down the legal tender law, what do those who really run things  do? Well they ALREADY knew that the decision was coming. Something this important never “just happens”. They were ready for it. They knew they wouldn’t have the votes so they had gotten a law passed right before it came down to BUMP UP the number of justices BACK up to 9. And while the Southern States were operated under military occupation in this great free country, they got their man Grant and the reconstruction Congress to put two justices on the court that were friendly to the concept of stealing from the people. And thus just ONE YEAR after the decision STRIKING DOWN the legal tender scam they REVERSED the decision. Knox v. Lee, 79 U.S. 457 (1871).

I have a problem taking formal events seriously.  Is that wrong?

I have a problem taking formal events seriously since they are mostly just a bunch of “top guys” giving each other reach-arounds.  I tend to like women who feel the same. Is that wrong?

Yes. The court reversed itself just ONE year later on THE EXACT SAME ISSUE. Does that make sense?  Do you see why you’ve never heard about this now? Here is how Wiki innocently describes the situation.

In Hepburn, Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase held for a 4-3 majority of the Court that the Act was an unconstitutional violation of the Fifth Amendment..On the same day that Hepburn was decided, President Ulysses Grant nominated two new justices to the Court, Joseph Bradley and William Strong, although Grant later denied that he had known about the decision in Hepburn when the nominations were made.[6] Bradley and Strong subsequently voted to reverse the Hepburn decision, in Knox v. Lee and Parker v. Davis, by votes of 5-4.

Did you catch that? On the SAME DAY. Lol I’m sure that the very much sober and  honorable President Grant was certainly telling the truth when he denied any connection.  I’m sure it was all just coincidence and bungling and chance like every other coincidence of history that screws the people and serves the money power.

I have been told that I have a somewhat unusual court room manner.

I have been told that I have a somewhat unusual court room manner.

I am going to excerpt from the DISSENT in the case that REVERSED the issue just one year later. It is critical that you read it to see that the JUSTICE knew what was happening and that this is not just some “crazy conspiracy theory” by yours truly.

A majority of the Court, five of four, in the opinion which has just been read, reverses the judgment rendered by the former majority of five to three, in pursuance of an opinion formed after repeated arguments, at successive terms, and careful consideration, and declares the legal tender clause to be constitutional — that is to say, that an act of Congress making promises to pay dollars legal tender as coined dollars in payment of preexisting debts is a means appropriate and plainly adapted to the exercise of powers expressly granted by the Constitution, and not prohibited itself by the Constitution but consistent with its letter and spirit. And this reversal, unprecedented in the history of the Court, has been produced by no change in the opinions of those who concurred in the former judgment….

Get it? The court was packed in order to jam “legal tender” down everyone’s throat during the unconstitutional period called “reconstruction”. A law that 4 members of the court KNEW was unconstitutional and would wreak havoc on the people. Laws that would, about 40 years later, allow private banks to then step in with the creation of the federal reserve to create money out of thin air for a private group of bankers.

Do you see now? The system is rigged, and the “history” you are taught is a fairy tale. It is rigged long in advance with a lot of planning. And to even tell PEOPLE THIS TRUTH is considered “kookery”. That is the part I love the most.

Here I am with my Uncle George.

         Me and my Uncle George.

“In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act”.– George Orwell


So why is it that NOBODY even KNOWS about this one and everyone does know about the FDR plan after attending the brainwashing centers the government runs?

Simple. You know about the FDR plan because it was allegedly  “thwarted”. That leaves the impression on you that the Constitutional system WORKS, that it protects your freedom and that the system’s integrity is INTACT. Do you see that?

What you may not know is that the reason they didn’t have to “pack the court” for FDR is because the court caved and approved the “New Deal” from just the threat.

My shrink says it's wrong to do, but my threats are an effective compliance system technique.

My shrink says it’s wrong for me to do, but I find this is an effective compliance technique so I don’t want to stop using it.   I don’t use a loaded gun, but they don’t need to know that.

So you hear all about this completely made up potential “constitutional crises” with FDR that was “somehow averted” by the brilliant constitutional system of fake ass checks and balances.  And you go away thinking that the system worked. Lol There never was any “constitutional crises” because the CONSTITUTION says NOTHING about the number of justices. The number has been changed many times and WILL be again if the money power needs to.  GET IT?

All they care is that YOU BELIEVE that the system worked because it is so great and you are so free, and that you NEVER learn about the REAL COURT PACKING SCHEME 70 YEARS EARLIER.  Classic distraction technique.

My suspicion is that had the court not folded so easily with FDR and had they NEEDED to “pack the court” to get the “new deal” through then you would not know anything about the whole charade. It wouldn’t have been “taught”.  Just like they didn’t teach you about the legal tender court pack. The first rule is always “IGNORE”.  Why stir a pot nobody is looking at? lol

Oh, you're in the wrong place, this is the County Clerk's office.

Come on in.  We the people are waiting for you in the back.

I find the whole thing quite entertaining. And if you think about it.  They are RIGHT, our political system is probably the greatest system ever conceived, but not for the reasons you are told or believe. It is the greatest system because it FOOLS the FOOLS so effectively despite what is right in front of them. lol

Congratulations to YOU if you made it to the end.  Most people just roll out and check for porn, lol.  I hope you have learned something useful.  And I hope you send it to someone who might be open to hearing the truth.

That’s all for now my brainwashed Brethren. Take care, live in the light and don’t forget to tell someone about the truth about the law.

Legalman IS the law

Legalman IS the law

P.S. Can you help a brother out? It’s All about the “LIKES”. Don’t hate the playa, hate the game.

The PEOPLES’ case for what happened at the constitutional convention.

You can see the judge was not impressed with my argument.

You can see the judge was not impressed with my argument.

We are steeped in a whole world of how wonderful our constitution is and what a miracle of freedom it was, etc.  Understanding how it is that nothing seems to WORK in PRACTICE as we are taught in school, starts with understanding what a spin job they put on the drafting and RATIFICATION of that constitution.  Now I don’t claim to be “telling the whole story”.  That is impossible anyway.  My goal here is to be the PEOPLES’ Lawyer.  To make the case ON BEHALF OF THE PEOPLE, instead of the money power. The OPPOSITE side of the story from what you’ve been told all your life.  Just a sketch.  A little “equal time”.  We need a little counter balance to the one way propaganda machine that describes this event.  I want to put it into some perspective for you.  Then you can make up your own mind.  Probably for the first time.

I am not a historian, I am just  a simple caveman lawyer. But I can read and I can understand bulls*** when I see it.  Don’t believe the brainwashing that only “scholars” and formal historians are fit to comment about “history”.  You don’t have to go through the archives to see what was really going on at the constitutional convention. I can see THE RESULT. And that is the gigantic federal government they claim is supported by a constitution they claim created only a  “limited” government.  Those two don’t fit together. So maybe it is worth a bit of time to look into what REALLY happened that summer in Philadelphia.

But wait there's more.  Not only will this constitution keep you free through a 1000 loads, it will do it for LESS than you are now paying for your laundry detergent.

But wait there’s more. Not only will this constitution withstand a 1000 loads of bs, it will do it for LESS than you are now paying.

When I read the ridiculous sales brochure called “The federalist papers” written by guys pushing for big government by selling “limited government” I start to get even MORE suspicious of the fairy tale I have been told.  I suspect, that it is always the same con.  Obamacare is sold as something to help reduce costs. Income tax is sold as only applying to the rich. Social Security is sold as a limited program where the social security number will NEVER be used as a national ID. The patriot act is sold as a way to make US SAFE. And on and on. People in government are habitual liars. It is WHAT THEY DO FOR A LIVING.

First off let’s be clear.  There was no “single mind” of the men who met in Philly that summer.  Some may have been decent honest people.  We can’t know that.  But what we can do is use common sense with what we do know and compare it and see what theory fits with the KNOWN facts.

To me, it is clear.  The people driving the bus that “august summer” when “history was made” and the “holy constitution” was drafted, were typical power hungry politicos and nothing more.  That doesn’t mean the place didn’t have plenty of honest well meaning individuals.  But the reality is that many of them walked out or didn’t bother attending because they KNEW what was up.   Whoever remained and did not stop what was going on, were either duped, didn’t care, or were in on it.

I appreciate the trouble your people went to in drafting this constitution, however, the people who wrote it were either in on the scam it or were too stupid to notice.  Either way, I can't endorse it.

I appreciate the trouble your people went to in drafting this constitution, however, after reading it, it is clear that the people who wrote it were either in on the scam or were too stupid to see it. Either way, I can’t endorse it.

For this article I have chosen to use a site that is run by an institution that is designed to “teach” the “teachers”. That’s right a propaganda school for propagandists. Here’s the site. If I quote it and I don’t tell you another source, that is the source I used.   I am going to give you an overview of my read of what THEY SAY happened, and what are checkable facts.

First, understand that those “holy men” who met in Philly that summer were NOT SENT THERE to do what they did. They were acting completely outside their “agency authority”. The recommendatory act of Congress that EMPOWERED the “constitutional convention” reads thus:

“A Convention of delegates should meet “for the sole purpose of revising the articles of Confederation and reporting to Congress and the several legislatures such alterations and provisions therein as shall, when agreed to in Congress and confirmed by the States, render the federal Constitution adequate to the exigencies of government and the preservation of the Union.” (Italics in the original of the version reprinted in Federalist 40.)”

Too bad this book wasn't available to the delegates so they could have understood what they were sent to do.

Too bad this book wasn’t available to the delegates so they could have understood what they were empowered to actually do.

They weren’t sent to tear up the articles of confederation and create this mammoth centralized power structure.  Got it?  There already was a constitution.  There already was an arrangement. It worked fine. It needed a little tweaking, nothing more.  When they went there and scrapped the whole thing they did something they had no agency authority to do.  NOBODY, not the people, not the legitimate government of the people, NOBODY Who sent them and who they CLAIMED to represent sent them up there to create a WHOLE NEW FORM OF CENTRALIZED GOVERNMENT.

Knowing that, let me ask you, if you’re doing something you KNOW you aren’t supposed to be doing, what is the NUMBER ONE thing you want and need while you are making your plans and doing it?  That’s right, make sure the proceedings are ALL SECRET and there are as few a records as possible.

The delegates also agreed that the deliberations would be kept secret. The case in favor of secrecy was that the issues at hand were so important that honest discourse needed to be encouraged and delegates ought to feel free to speak their mind, and change their mind, as they saw fit. …the windows were closed and heavy drapes drawn.”

Secrecy?  Check.  Are you picturing this?  It is the opposite of freedom of discourse FOR THE PEOPLE.  Secrecy is the heart of a conspiracy.  Look at that ridiculous excuse for it they give.  Absurd.  Not credible.  But doesn’t this all seem very familiar?  Of course it does.  Power grabbers do it all the time. Meet in “closed session” and keep all the details secret until they are ready to submit the bill, etc.  Can you say Hillary care or Obamacare?  THAT is the same thing that went on at the holy constitutional convention.

Here is a hand scribbled note from one of the delegates that is rarely seen by the public.

Here is note made at the constitutional convention by one of the delegates who subsequently WALKED out.  This type of thing is rarely seen by the public.

Before we get too far into it I think it is important to know WHAT KIND OF GOVERNMENT they were sent to improve.  The government that needed a small amount of tweaking. Here’s how it is described.

The Articles of Confederation created a nation of pre-existing states rather than a government over individuals. Thus, the very idea of a Bill of Rights was irrelevant because the Articles did not entail a government over individuals. The states were equally represented in the union regardless of size of population, only one branch was needed, normal political activity required the support of super majorities, the union was limited to the powers expressly enumerated, and amendment was required to endow the union with powers that weren’t specifically articulated. Amendments required the unanimous approval of all thirteen state legislatures.”

Are you seeing this?  It was a very small very DECENTRALIZED government.  THAT is what the people had CHOSEN AFTER THE WAR. Doesn’t this sound eerily familiar to what we are TOLD the basics of  the CONSTITUTION ARE. It is almost exactly what the federalist papers CLAIMS the constitution creates but with just a teeny tiny bit more “authority” so “it runs better”.

Of course you can return it if you don't like it.  Trust me, you're gonna love it.  This constitution was hardly driven.  It will last for years. You'll be able to collect trillions in taxes with this thing. i GUARANTEE it.

Of course you can return it if you don’t like it. Trust me, you’re gonna love it. This constitution will last for years. You’ll be able to collect trillions in taxes with this thing. Nobody will catch on, I personally GUARANTEE it.

And of course they had to sell it like it was just a tweak to the system because that is what they were sent to do and they knew the People didn’t want what they had ACTUALLY done. So they sold them a load of crapola about limited government and express powers etc. etc. The guys pushing it wrote the federalist papers to sell it.  The government that EXISTS and that WE EXPERIENCE bears no resemblance to what they DESCRIBE. It is all an illusion.  That’s why we can never “get back to the constitution”.

Well let’s give them the benefit of the doubt.  Maybe the proceeding notes and minutes can at least illuminate what went on there even if the discussions themselves were held in secret. Oops, no such thing. They didn’t bother to keep any official record of the proceedings. No minutes taken.  Darn, I hate it when that happens.  All we have to try and piece together what went on there are Mr. BIG GOVERNMENT himself’s personal notes. The other attendees only made sporadic notes about certain issues. So, secret proceedings, no record. Check check.

James Madison took extensive Notes of the proceedings and although some scholars have questioned their authenticity and completeness, they remain the primary source for reproducing the conversations at the Convention.”

So in other words we are put in the position of having to rely on what Nancy Pelosi tells us went on when she met with Harry Reid and the rest of the gang.  Makes sense. This sounds like  the exact kind of arrangement that I would expect to find when agents for “we the people” meet.  Oh and did I mention that even Madison’s  notes weren’t made public for about 35 years. Yeah, that too. So secret meetings, no documentation released to the public, and a group of delegates sent by the people to do one thing who did something else. Yeah, I’m getting that freedom vibe baby.

Relax people, the notes are safe.  See them? Of course you can see them. Just not at this particular time.  Come back in 50 years.

Relax people, the Madison’s notes are safe. See them? Oh, you want to see them before you vote?  Of course you can see them. Just not at this particular time. Come back in 50 years.

Well maybe it was unclear at the time they were overstepping and that they were way over the line?   No, turns out they knew. In fact delegates from Connecticut, New Jersey, Delaware, New York argued:

“that the Convention had exceeded the Congressional mandate because the Articles had in fact been scrapped rather than revised. Thus the Convention had violated the rule of law. Moreover, the Convention was about to propose a novelty——a large country under one republican form of government——that would never be accepted by the electorate. These delegates knew… republican government could only exist in areas of small extent where the people kept close watch over their representatives.

Are you getting the picture? Remember I am using the teaching tool for teachers. But I am rearranging it and putting it in the CORRECT order so you can see what really went on there.

The guys pushing this thing knew that the time was running out to capitalize on the public’s image of them from the revolutionary war. They were extremely, crazily wealthy land owners.  How suspicious would you be if the 25 richest people in america, like Buffet, and Zuckerberg etc. all met in secret with no notes of the proceedings and came out and said, Eureka, we have drafted a document FOR THE PEOPLE? lol. Well that is what ACTUALLY happened that summer.

The guys driving this boat wanted a centralized BIG GOVERNMENT THEY controlled but they knew the people wouldn’t go for that, so they hid it in the details.

Several statesmen, especially George Washington, were concerned that the idea of an American mind that had emerged during the war with Britain was about to disappear and the Articles of Confederation were inadequate to foster the development of an American character.

It is a little known fact that George Washington actually started the foster care system in this country.  He wanted to be sure we all had a fair chance.

It is a little known fact that George Washington actually started the foster care system in this country to develop “the American character” . He was quite the humanitarian as far as a slave owner goes.

He wanted to foster “an American character”. Who is he to WANT anything for anyone else? What is “an American character” anyway?  This is just code talk for a centralized power structure to CONTROL the people “in the country” There already was a constitution.  It was a FEDERATION, not a giant centralized country the people had CHOSEN. He was “concerned” the “idea of an American mind” was about to disappear. I’m sure he was.  He understood that very soon they would no longer be able to play that “revolutionary war hero card” to trick people into buying this scam, so they needed to act NOW. Get it?

Who didn’t hear growing up as a kid in school about how Washington “could have been King” if he wanted, but chose not to because he was so noble and humble etc.  Where is there ANY actual evidence for this idea that the people were clamoring to have him be a king? Look at the actual government they had chosen. It is the opposite of a monarchy. It was totally decentralized. The idea that the people wanted him as a king is so ridiculous. Honestly, it is insulting. It’s like saying Obamacare is wildly popular. How do we know this? Oh, because the people administering Obamacare tell us so.It is absurd. Washington was a social climbing man who married a wealthy woman with connections and proceeded to parlay it into a huge land fortune.  That’s WHO HE WAS. 

They produced a constitution to create a giant centralized monster OVER TIME through the courts and then they sold it as a limited government.  It was the greatest deceptive trade practices act violation in history.  It is hardly a moment to rejoice and remember longingly as having “secured our freedom”.

And the delegates wondered whether or not the power to create a national university was implied within the meaning of the necessary and proper clause.”

Are you seeing this? This is the kind of propaganda they floated to get it passed.  Worried about the authority to create a national university? Cue the belly laugh.  are they kidding?  They “have the power” to tell you what kind of light bulbs you can use?

Known as the "final solution" this note shows the compromise proposed for how the constitution would be  ratified.

Known as the “final solution” this note shows the compromise proposed by Madison  for calculating the votes necessary to ratify the constitution.

Look at some facts. 70 delegates were chosen to go to the convention. Only 55 ever even WENT. So 20% of the people had NO REPRESENTATION AT ALL at the convention. It takes 75% of the states to get an amendment passed under the document, but did 75% of the delegates WHO EVEN ATTENDED sign the thing? NO. 39 of 55 THAT ATTENDED signed it. So 39 of a total of 70 CHOSEN ever signed it.  That is just 55% signing! And remember Rhode Island refused to even send any delegates because they smelled a rat just like Patrick Henry did. 

So how did they get this stinker through?  Simple they used the same kind of tricks they use now.  You know, where it goes to committee and then gets changed and then jammed through right before a holiday with low turn out etc.  Games people.  Games.

Remember they were sent by the states to fix the articles.  And the empowering document empaneled them: for the sole purpose of revising the articles of Confederation and reporting to Congress and the several legislatures such alterations and provisions therein as shall, when agreed to in Congress…”

So they WERE empowered to come up with a fix, and then REQUIRED to bring it back to Congress and have CONGRESS approve it.  So did they follow the law?  Of course not.  Do you see? the guys in charge DON’T bother to follow the law.  But they insist you “FOLLOW THE LAW”.  It is game theory.

The reason they didn’t bring it back to Congress for approval like they were SUPPOSED TO, is because,they knew that it would NEVER be approved by Congress, who were the Peoples’ representatives.  So instead they claimed they wanted to “take it to the people” directly.  What a charade.

In order to fulfill the revolutionary principle that the consent of the governed is the only legitimate foundation of government, the Framers proposed a popular-based ratification, rather than exclusively state-based ratification. But as a nod to reality, the voice of the whole people was collected through state-based popular conventions.

What double talk bs.  “As a nod to reality..”.  Look there was NOTHING preventing the vote from being a DIRECT VOTE of the people. But did they do that?  No, they put the vote in the hands of yet another group of “delegates” chosen to then go vote for the people.  Why? How does that make sense? Simple, it builds in a layer so they could manipulate and FIX that VOTE.  It’s always the same. They are simply liars. Like so many other politicians. They lie to people for a living and the people never bother to look into it.

Annual commemorative  re enactment of the unanimous vote that took place at the Delaware convention approving the constitution.

Annual commemorative re enactment of the unanimous vote that took place at the Delaware convention approving the constitution.  The participants are careful to accurately reproduce every detail of the actual vote.  

So how did the actual vote go down? Remember this is to CREATE AN ENTIRELY NEW GOVERNMENT? Surely in order to do that you have to get a “super majority” of votes to approve it in EACH state!!  So was any type of super majority required? Of course not. lol Why would they make a limitation like that part of the process?  That would only assure they could never get the power they wanted.  The basics are this. They needed 9 states to “approve”, meaning they needed to bribe at least one extra delegate from the needed 9 states.  Here are the 8 states where they didn’t get a super majority of 75% as is required to amend it.

 NY. 30-27,  NH 57-47, VA 89-79, RI 34-32, MA. 187-168, NC 194-77 Pa. 46-23,  S.C. 149-73

Look at THOSE NUMBERS. Look at how CLOSE that is in 5 of the states.  And that is using the jerry rigged system they created instead of just putting it to the people and requiring a SUPER majority of voters to approve in EACH STATE. Think about what that jacked up scammed up vote has wrought.  Is that what self determination looks like for a whole PEOPLE?  No, it is absurd.

And this doesn’t even take into account that ONCE AGAIN there are NO NOTES of the proceedings or the discussions that the delegates undertook before making their votes.  There were no supervisors, no people allowed to watch the proceedings, no oversight of the financial affairs of the delegates, no follow up to be sure they hadn’t been bribed  etc. etc.  Nothing.

Inspired by the freedoms in our country people around the world are inspired to copy the methods used to found our great nation.

Inspired by the freedoms in our country people around the world attempt to copy the methods used to count the votes for the founding of our great nation.

Oh and did I mention that there were three states, NJ, DE and GA who’s “delegates” all voted UNANIMOUSLY and quickly in favor. ??? And once again, no notes about what took place. Are you telling me that a document, created in secret with no authority to go do it and no notes or proceedings kept during it, and that was designed to form a WHOLE NEW government had UNANIMOUS approval from the people of three states in a matter of months!?  Absurd!

Here is what THE STATE OF DELAWARE ITSELF tells us about the “election” of these delegates who then went on to unanimously vote for it with virtually no known discussion or record of the proceedings.

The elections were held and thirty men were chosen to meet in Dover and decide the action Delaware would take on this important matter. History tells us that all the elections were orderly with one exception–the one held in Sussex County. here we find, from the words of a political pamphleteer of the time that armed men prevented a fair election.”

Are you seeing this?  This is from a government site!  Evidence of ARMED MEN preventing a fair election of the delegates?Nothing to see here, move along you had your election.  “The people have spoken”. Sound familiar?  How much constant vote fraud is there today? It was no different then. They don’t even claim to have bothered to keep any records etc.

Here is the last and most extensive quote I will put here. And remember this is the teachers teacher and it is discussing the extremely quick unanimous approval by Delaware, where Delawares’ own website says there were reports of armed men preventing a fair election of the electors. Biden’s home state, known far and wide as a center of corruption.

rigged voteUnfortunately, there is no record of the proceedings or significant correspondence that might illuminate what took place. It is clear, however, that Bedford and Bassett needed to do very little explaining because the 30 people who were elected were all Federalists, and all were in favor of adopting the Constitution before they even entered the ratifying convention. These 30 people showed up in Dover on December 4th, and these delegates representing the 60,000 people of Delaware had a momentous decision to make. Shall we or shall we not ratify this Constitution? Three days later, they ratified. There was not much conversation. They were all in agreement and they also behaved themselves. Not one deviated from what the voters understood when they were elected — I voted for you and you will vote for ratification… Now it might strike you as a little odd, given the conventional wisdom, that Delaware, the smallest state in the Union, had no objection to ratifying. There are all kinds of self-interested, even conspiratorial, theories that have circulated over the years to explain away this oddity including that Delaware ratified first in order to be favorably considered for federal grants.

Honestly, you can’t make the stuff up.  It is beyond farce.  And this is what we ARE TOLD represents self determination and freedom?  Remember, they did what the people had told them to do.  Really? Well what about those reports of armed men at the polls?  Does any of this pass the most basic smell test?  It doesn’t for me.

Go my brainwashed Brethren and investigate it yourself if you care to.  I encourage it.  But I think it is pretty clear what went on, and it isn’t the celebration of freedom you were told as a child.  Go nose around and see all of the “conspiratorial theories” that abound about bribes and everything else.

Why wasn’t it just PUT TO THE PEOPLE? Why wasn’t a super majority required to pass it? Why are there no records? Why was everything kept secret?

Doing THAT freedom dance baby!

Yes, he’s doing THAT freedom dance again baby!

Why? Well because they were selflessly creating a freedom machine for all times of course. A freedom machine for the ages. A freedom machine that the very same freedom machine itself now says you can’t leave. And who would want to leave such a wonderful freedom machine anyway? Only a crazy person or maybe a “Terrorist”.

My friend my work is done on this. The rest is up to you. I have showed you the framework. I have given you the keys. You can either crank it up and take it for a drive, or you can just leave it in the garage and go back to catch the season finale of  “The Voice”.  Gives July 4th a whole new perspective doesn’t it?

That’s all for now. Take care my brainwashed Brethren, don’t be down, live in the light and don’t forget to tell someone about the truth about the law.

Legalman IS the law

Legalman IS the law

The little case that threatened the entire Banking system.

Just FYI, this is what an actual coincidence looks like.

Just FYI, this is what an actual coincidence looks like.

I want to tell you about a simple little case from an obscure little court, where the findings and verdict posed such a danger to the money power, that they tried to prevent the judge from even entering the verdict. He refused. One week later the judge had an “unfortunate” fishing accident and died.

As for the lawyer/individual who brought the case and won it to the jury? Well he was coincidentally disbarred. Oh and the case findings? they were “nullified” on procedural grounds because well, “that’s the law”. And now of course, any lawyer who attempts to cite the case, well, they too face sanctions and possible disbarment by the “licensing” system the government runs that “allows” them to operate in the “legal system” the government runs. Remember, it is all just “following the law”.  What, do you not “support law and order”? You probably hate kittens too then.

So what in the world could the case have stood for that made the system react so violently? Simple. It exposed the truth about the banking system in a simple and straightforward way that allowed anyone to understand the fraud that it is. 

And, just as importantly, it showed how the people could defend themselves. 

Chomsky quoteBefore I tell you about “The Credit River Case” I want to make sure you understand the legal issue.  In order to have a contract even the NSA admits you need the following.
At common law, the elements of a contract are offer, acceptance, intention to create legal relations, and consideration.

This just means the parties have to discuss terms, come to agreement on the terms and then we both have to be OBLIGATED to exchange something of value. The something of value is called “consideration” in the law. Here, from the same NSA link, is what they say about that.

Consideration is something of value given by a promissor to a promisee in exchange for something of value given by a promisee to a promissor. Typically, the thing of value is a payment, although it may be an act, or forbearance to act, when one is privileged to do so, such as an adult refraining from smoking. This thing of value or forbearance from some legal right is considered to be a legal detriment. In the exchange of legal detriments, a bargain is created.

It's so beautiful isn't it? Here is another legally binding contract where it is difficult to determine whether the "consideration" was valid.

It’s so beautiful isn’t it? Here is an excellent example of a legally binding contract where it can be difficult to determine whether the “consideration” was valid, and what the exact terms were.

So not only do we have to agree to the exchange, but you have to each exchange something of value that is considered a “legal detriment”. It must be real. If you pay me with counterfeit money, well, the contract “fails for lack of consideration”, in legal terminology. You “gave me” something that “was not real and not what we discussed” so I didn’t get the “benefit of the bargain”  That is really all contract law is, a formal discussion of agreements between people.

So now with that legal understanding, let’s look at the  “Credit River Case”.  I encourage you to go look at all of the paperwork yourself if you are interested go to page and search the link for credit river docs mid page.

The case is straightforward.  The Bank/Plaintiff was trying to foreclose, and the property owner/Defendant was defending the action claiming that there was no valid consideration given by the bank under the contract because it simply created the “money” that it “gave” by making a bookkeeping entry. Here is how the court described it.

Lawrence V. Morgan was the only witness called for Plaintiff (Bank)  and Defendant testified as the only witness in his own behalf.   Plaintiff brought this as a Common Law action for the recovery of the possession …by foreclosure of a Note and Mortgage Deed….

Defendant appeared and answered that the Plaintiff created the money and credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry as the consideration for the Note and Mortgage of May 8, 1964 and alleged failure of the consideration for the Mortgage Deed and alleged that the Sheriff’s sale passed no title to plaintiff.

The issues tried to the Jury were whether there was a lawful consideration and whether Defendant had waived his rights to complain about the consideration having paid on the Note for almost 3 years.

Mr. Morgan (the Bank’s only witness) admitted that all of the money or credit which was used as a consideration was created upon their books, that this was standard banking practice exercised by their bank in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, another private Bank, further that he knew of no United States Statute or Law that gave the Plaintiff the authority to do this.

"Owned", hmmm, exactly how did they buy that again?

“Owned”, hmmm, exactly what did they use to buy it with again?  I’m a bit unclear on that.

So a straightforward simple case with very straightforward allegations.  The case was tried to a jury.  They found against the bank.  Basically finding that the bank WAS NOT ENTITLED TO POSSESSION because it hadn’t given ANY CONSIDERATION when it made the mortgage!!  

Here is the short memorandum opinion that the court entered into the record with the order after the trial.  The order the powers that be did everything they could to prevent the judge from entering.

The issues in this case were simple. There was no material dispute of the facts for the Jury to resolve.
Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, which are for all practical purposes, because of their interlocking activity and practices, and both being Banking Institutions Incorporated under the Laws of the United States, are in the Law to be treated as one and the same Bank, did create the entire $14,000.00 in money or credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the Consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note. See Ansheuser-Busch Brewing Company v. Emma Mason, 44 Minn. 318, 46 N.W. 558. The Jury found that there was no consideration and I agree. Only God can create something of value out of nothing….

Plaintiff’s (Bank’s) act of creating credit is not authorized by the Constitution and Laws of the United States, is unconstitutional and void, and is not a lawful consideration in the eyes of the Law to support any thing or upon which any lawful right can be built….

Both parties were given complete liberty to submit any and all facts to the Jury, at least in so far as they saw fitNo complaint was made by Plaintiff that Plaintiff did not receive a fair trial. From the admissions made by Mr. Morgan the path of duty was direct and clear for the Jury.

Now that gives me an idea.

Banker’s are hardly man’s best friend.

And that is the case and the opinion that quite literally set off a sh**storm.  Why? Because it very simply explained the fraud that is Banking.  And when given the undisputed facts, the jury had quite RIGHTLY found that there is no actual consideration given by the Bank because the bank just creates the money out of thin air. It doesn’t actually LEND MONEY IT HAS so the contract is not valid!

Do you see how dangerous this case is?  Under no circumstances can these ideas become known or discussed openly as anything even POSSIBLY legitimate.  It Had to be “erased” and found to be “kookery”.

Think of the implications otherwise.   A jury of regular people had been told the truth about what banks clearly do EVERYDAY and they saw that it is nothing but fraud. Nobody has agreed to allow banks to create money out of thin air.  The mortgages and other loans the bank’s make do not have any actual consideration!

Most people in the country assume that when someone borrows money from a bank that the bank is actually lending you some of the money that it has on deposit. But that is just not true under the fractional reserve system we have.  And if people understood this undeniable fact, as Henry Ford said, there would be a revolution overnight.  And so those in charge make sure nobody does find out.

The process by which money is created is so simple the mind is repelled.”—John Kenneth Galbraith

The law quite literally gives a protected class of private individuals, “central bankers”, (and their facilitators) the right to create money out of thin air, and then to “lend out” the made up money and collect interest on it.  You have to work. They do not.

An honest thief, Josiah Stamp

An honest thief, Josiah Stamp

“The bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take away from them the power to create money and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money.” — Josiah Stamp Former Director of the Bank of England

The poor soon to be dead judge in this case clearly was a man of principle.  He believed the big lie he had been told about our country and the founding documents and our supposed “freedom”.  He believed the system was what he had been taught.  He was sadly mistaken and apparently paid for that mistake with his life in the form of a fishing accident.

The modern banker plying his craft.

The modern banker plying his craft.

There are two basic types of control systems. Overt systems,  meaning openly with force or threats, and covert systems, enforced, by way of disguise or in secret. In an OVERT system of control, the people CAN SEE the force used to keep them down, like in North Korea.  Therefore they KNOW that the legal system is rigged against them.  In a covert system the people are tricked into imagining they are in control and that therefore the legal system is “fair”. That is the key difference.

Our system is a covert system.  Therefore the ENTIRE system relies upon the people believing that they are in charge of the system, that the system works for them and that it is fair.

One of the most difficult concepts for people to grasp and accept is that the legal system is not there to dispense justice. It is there to control you under the GUISE that it is there to dispense justice.

The only obstacle that any covert system faces, such as ours, is making sure the people don’t find out  the TRUTH about the system.  Like the truth that this case exposes. And that is why so much time and money is spent brainwashing people very early on in government schools under government curriculum about justice and liberty and pledges of allegiance, etc. etc. And that is why the media tells us nonstop about how just and wonderful a country we have our whole lives.

So now that you see the reality of the system, let’s recap what happened in this case.  The BANK filed the case in the court. The BANK looked to the Court to take the property.  The bank did not complain it didn’t get a fair trial.  The bank did not complain it was not allowed to put on its evidence. The evidence used by the jury was the BANK’S own witness’ admissions.  The facts of this case were not in dispute! 

And what was the result of all this after the jury found against the bank?  The bank ended up winning “later” on procedural grounds after the judge ended up dead, and the lawyer ended up disbarred.   Do you see the real system yet?

I don't whether to laugh or cry when I see people who are so deluded. They actually think that they have to WAIT for 9 guys and gals to GIVE them their RIGHTS.

I don’t know whether to laugh or cry when I see people who are so deluded. They actually think that they have to WAIT for 9 guys and gals to GIVE them their RIGHTS.

What more does it take for you to see that the Constitution prevents NOTHING!  It is not part of the solution, it is part of the problem.  Continuously talking about “getting back to it” and “enforcing it” and “its principles and limitations” just drains off energy that could be used to create REAL change.

If the constitution or the system actually did anything that people imagine, then outcomes like THIS could never happen. And if they did, the people would know about them and those responsible would have been brought to justice.  But none of THAT ACTUALLY happened because that is not what the system ACTUALLY does.

The system is there to control you, but its success depends entirely on you never finding this fact out.

I can’t take anymore freedom today.  Plus there are the limitations of space. There is a lot more to the case that happened afterwards. If you want to find out about it, I wrote about that here.  Because I am done for today. 

I hope you learned something. Take care my brainwashed Brethren.  Live in the light and tell someone the truth about the law.

P.S. Can you help a brother out? It’s ALL about the “LIKES”.  Don’t hate the playa, hate the game. If you like my site then take a second and hit the LIKE button!  Then SHARE it.  You can do it. I have faith in you. It is much appreciated.